
Saturday, March 6, 2010
One Hell of a Good Idea

Quitcherbabycryin'

Point of Order: Civilization

Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Un Mystere.
The End of Days

A Refutation of Intelligent Design

Friday, February 26, 2010
Olympic Crisis!

Thursday, February 25, 2010
Idiocy Alert!

Friday, February 19, 2010
Fixing America

Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Notes on Westminster

- That Weimaraner is beautiful.
- The view from the back of the Black Russian Terrier is a bit, let's say, ample. And his name was ridiculous. And the whole 'not for the first time dog owner' commentary was a bit Cold War, wasn't it?
- That is a beautiful boxer. Especially in profile. I'm not sure that I don't think it's facial markings aren't a bit distracting from the geometry of its head.
- It's true. The Doberman is beautiful. The coloration, especially is so velvety and rich.
- Dogs of French origin are hilarious. Dogue de Bordeaux? Hilarious. PBGV? Hilarious.
- Am I the only one who thinks that the Great Dane is a bit pigeon-toed? And perhaps a pound or two thin? Nice gait, though.
- I'm not into the facial geometries of the Great Pyrenees. Too pinched around the eyes, and too trapezoidal of a muzzle.
- Komondor are awesome. Anyone who doesn't agree is crazy. I can't possibly imagine what their undercarriage must be like filth and dander-wise.
- The Mastiff, as Foucault would've seen it, is an initiator of discursive practice. If we're talking dogs, of course. They're all amazing.
- The Neapolitan Mastiff is pretty wild. The skin distribution on that thing is akin to a Shar Pei, which makes me wonder the extent to which the Venetians, Sig. Polo particularly, can be blamed.
- That Portuguese Water Dog was too spazzy. Leaning in the stack, shaking, and running diagonally.
- Rottweiler. Shout out to Kingston.
- I'm not really into white dogs, but I think the Samoyed might be the coolest of the bunch. Interesting how the olive-brown tones of the handler's shoes draws the eye to the ways in which a white coat actually contains sweeping color gradations. I wonder if she planned that.
- Siberian Huskies are great because they remind us that so many breeds still have a little wolf in them.
- I love the facial coloration on this Standard Schnauzer.
- Tibetan Mastiffs have the most beautifully emotional faces. So many different states of mind simultaneously.
- I just saw the cut. I'd go with the boxer. The Doberman is also great. That Akita would be in my top four. And the Kuvasz would round it out. In that order. There, I said it.
- But I feel bad about the Tibetan Mastiff.
- Yeah, I don't get the Portuguese Water Dog or the Malamute.
- Dandie Dinmont Terrier. That's what I'm talking about.
- Am I the only one seeing a weird groom on this Airedale that makes it look like the line of its rib cage carries across its back leg?
- That Am Staff doesn't really want to be touched, does she?
- People think that they look weird, but Bedlington Terriers are quite beautiful if you stop expecting a round headed dog and look at its ovoid rectangularity instead. It's a geometric divergence from the norm, but quite elegant nonetheless.
- If I were you, I wouldn't piss off a Border Terrier. You'll lose. Look at that little bastard. Pure killing machine. That's the thing with Terriers. Up close, you're lunch.
- I don't really know the standard, but that Bull Terrier (Colored) looks like it has extra long front legs. And the Bull Terrier (White) needs to gain weight in its front legs. This makes me think that I really need to read the standard.
- Holy Shit! That's Cathy. Pennywise Kennels, people. Dandie Dinmont Terriers. The best of the best. Don't even ask twice. 2004 AKC Breeder of the Year. She's the best.
- For once in my life, I actually like the coloring on a Smooth Fox Terrier. That's a pretty damn nice dog.
- This Wire Fox Terrier wouldn't be my 14th Best in Show winner. It wouldn't even be in my cut, so far.
- The Glen of Imaal Terrier is really wild. Makes me think of how that's an Irish line of Terrier and not Scottish.
- It's really too bad that Joe Garagiola isn't doing the color commentary anymore. He was amazing, and, for those of you that have seen Best in Show, the prototype. Fred Willard owes him a ton. Tamron Hall, bless her heart, just can't fill those shoes. If anyone knows anyone who works at USA, tell them I'll do it next year.
- So far, I'm going with the Dandie, the Smooth Fox, and the Bedlington. I hope this judge doesn't do something corny and go with one of those breeds that always wins just because they always win. Not that I begrudge the dog the win, but Terrier judging can be a bit traditionalist for my tastes.
- I sort of think that this Parson Russell is ok, but I really don't know the standard at all. Mainly because most of the ones you see running around aren't up to the AKC standard.
- Shit, man. That Scottie is really pretty textbook. I can see why she's winning everything. Gonna be hard for anyone else to beat that. Whoever groomed that dog needs a little credit as well. Propers.
- Speaking of white dogs, but not really all white, the Sealyham Terrier is pretty great.
- The Skye Terrier is proof that judging a dog is a tactile experience. How the hell am I supposed to judge that dog's bone structure on TV?
- Clearly, this judge and I have very different tastes in Terriers. Excepting that Smooth Fox and the Scottie, who will probably win this sucker. This is actually a sort of interesting dilemma. Dogs are judged according to individual breed standards as adopted by the AKC. However, in an ideal show, each dog would be a perfect manifestation of its breed. Thus, the dilemma of taste in relation to a preordained canon. Perhaps this interestingly problematized Greenberg's notions as discussed in 'Can Taste Be Objective?." I've never thought of it that way before.
- If I were handling that Sealyham, I'd be pissed at the woman with the Westie for crowding me.
- Turn the damn lights on. This is about evaluating dogs, not theatre.
- After the first go around, the Brittany is my dark horse candidate, with the Scottie looking best, essentially even is the Doberman.
- Every year this guy has a great poodle, but I'm just not into poodles at all.
- I have absolutely no idea who I'd give this to. Every year it's impossible. I think I'd go with the Doberman, to be honest, but I'd feel really bad about not giving it to the Brittany, and the people who say I should give it to the Scottie have an indisputable argument.
- I hope I'm not the only person that gives that French Bulldog a lot of credit. That's a beautiful dog.
- Well, you can't argue that.
Umm...
Monday, February 15, 2010
Further Proof That There is a God

Wednesday, February 10, 2010
An Open Letter to Dave Mustaine

I underestimated you. You see, the last time we spent any time together, I was in high school.
Cat Question, Episode 2
Monday, February 8, 2010
Confused Yogism
Cat Question
Holy Shit!
Friday, January 29, 2010
I Did it Again
Super Bowl Update #2

Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Super Bowl Update #1
Monday, January 25, 2010
Required Reading
INT. ROOM WITH A FIREPLACE—EVENING
Two men sit in cushioned chairs facing each other under soft lighting. MCGWIRE is a former ballplayer with a graying goatee and a dress shirt open at the collar. He looks smaller than in his playing days, like a grape gone straight to raisin. COSTAS is an ageless TV journalist wearing a serious tie. He has notes in hand but rarely looks at them. He knows this drill.
COSTAS (somewhat incredulous)
What you're sitting here telling me is that you could have done essentially what you did without ever touching performance-enhancing drugs.
MCGWIRE (voice shaking, bites lip)
That's why it's the most regrettable thing I've ever done in my life.
It was good theater, wasn't it? For 48 minutes on Jan. 11, Mark McGwire deluded himself in front of Bob Costas on the MLB Network, the climax to a one-day steroid confessional that began with a statement to the Associated Press and interviews with select major media outlets. Touch 'em all. Call it the Redemption Rollout scene in another baseball chick flick filled with tears, produced to cleanse McGwire's image just in time for his reentry into baseball as the Cardinals' hitting coach.
The director of this p.r. strategy: a sports communications firm run by Ari Fleischer, the spokesman during the early years of W's White House—an administration not well-versed in apologies. But Fleischer didn't require an education in contrition to guide McGwire; he merely had to stage a public display that would go straight to YouTube. Whether a player's I'm sorry spills out evasively (Jason Giambi) or clumsily (Alex Rodriguez), with earnestness (Andy Pettitte) or cluelessness (Manny Ramirez), he need only emit emotion and never admit to cheating. He must calibrate his words like an artful banker: concede mistakes but never confess to perpetrating a fraud built on exotic numbers that brought riches at the expense of clean players and the bill-paying public. Plenty of regret, zero refunds.
And yet as angry as folks are with Wall Street, no one is looking to claw back the loot gained by deceptive athletes. "Sports fans are the most forgiving consumers of any industry," says David Carter, executive director at USC's Sports Business Institute. "If any other business treated its customers the way athletes treat their fans, in a lot of cases they would not have anyone lining up." Outrage barely lasts an inning. After McGwire endures the excoriation period—taking his beatdown from bloggers—he will no doubt become the beneficiary of America's short attention span as everyone Googles the next foolish act by a sports figure. (Gilbert Arenas brandishes pistols in locker room! Lane Kiffin runs out on Vols!)
And why wouldn't elite athletes, already awash in perks from red-carpet passes to punch cards for strippers, feel entitled to unconditional forgiveness once they express sorrow as the cameras roll? (Think it wouldn't have worked for Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds? Just imagine if they had been less defiant.) Wrap up the comeback with a title—think Kobe or A-Rod lifting a championship trophy—and a disgraced star is once again a darling.
But true atonement isn't intertwined with a victory parade. It's a private reckoning—with your conscience and with those you've harmed. What makes McGwire's coming out now most disturbing is how self-serving it is: His confession was a career move. The redheaded slugger had never told his son, Matt, whom he hoisted at the plate after he wrapped his biceps around homer number 62 in September 1998. Had he used Matt as a prop throughout the phony joyride? He had never told Roger Maris's children, who had to grieve the loss of their father's single-season home run record with grace and dignity from the front row that same season. How could McGwire have put them through that? He had never told St. Louis manager Tony La Russa, whose smarty-pants don't quite fit the same after he depicted McGwire to be as pure as spring water all these years. How willfully ignorant does the manager look now?
Of course, if every ball the Cards hit looks as if it's hitched to a comet next season, the collateral damage of McGwire's lies will be largely forgotten. He'll be Big Mac again in a happy Hollywood ending. "There is no sacredness to [sports] anymore," says Charles E. Yesalis, a retired Penn State professor who has written books on PEDs. "The games and the players are seen as another form of entertainment. Look, I like Spielberg movies, and I know there are special effects, but all I want is the movie. I don't want to see how the special effects are made during it. It would wreck it."
To see the reality is to ruin the escapism in sports. So offenders of all kinds are routinely welcomed back to the land of make believe. A St. Louis Dispatch headline last Friday read, MCGWIRE GETS BACK TO WORK; RELIEVED AND "READY TO MOVE ON." I get the need for closure, and certainly there's a place for forgiveness. But only if it is earned through personal accountability and not merely bestowed as a welcome-back present. Shouldn't atonement require more than a staged television event in which the actor takes a deep breath, dabs his eyes and says, "Bless me, Bob Costas, for I have sinned"?
Saturday, January 23, 2010
10 from the 00s
Also read Ben Street's Top Ten. You can't miss it. It's right above mine.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Review: Yinka Shonibare: Mother and Father Worked Hard So I Can Play @ St. Louis Art Museum

Monday, January 11, 2010
The 2010 LeRoys
The I Told You So: Tony Romo and Mark Sanchez
Facebooking
The Making Kids Seem Amusing Award: Julie Henderson tie with Nikki Green
Best Movie Seen on Netflix: Coraline tie with Berlin: Symphony of a City
Most Underwhelming Movie Seen on Netflix or in the Theatre: Inglorious Basterds
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Paradigm Shift

OK, this will gross some of you out. Vegetarians beware. Vegans don't even bother. Raw fooders, this won't even be in your lexicon.
I went to Hot Doug's in Chicago (corner of S. California and W. Roscoe) this past week.It changed my life.
I used to think tubed meat was suspect at best. Always a gamble, rarely gourmet.
Holy Sweet Relish was I wrong.
We had a Chicago style dog which, for the uninitiated, involves a beef dog on a sesame seed bun with sliced tomatoes, diced onions, electric green relish, mustard, a sliver of pickle. It's the greatest indigenous twist on a national staple I can think of.
Then, we had two others. Get ready...
A venison and blueberry dog with blackberry sauce and goat cheese and...drum roll please...a duck and black truffle dog with foie gras.
Magic.
Frankly, I've only had this kind of transformative experience twice before in my life.
The first was Pizza al Volo in Venice. The second was Cozy Corner BBQ in Memphis.
I cannot stress enough how unbelievably superior each of these three eateries are.
I'm going to publish a book called "Three Things to Eat Before You Die."
Cancel that, I just told you. Go forth and engorge.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010
I Hereby Volunteer for Democracy

Monday, January 4, 2010
Trifectas, Part 2

Point of Order

Sunday, January 3, 2010
Flippin' Irish

Saturday, December 26, 2009
A Blooming Good Charity

Thursday, December 24, 2009
A Bit O' Christmas Cheer

How come Rudolph and the reindeers never unionized?
I was telling a friend of mine about this.
Saying it would be a good idea for something.
The unionizing of the reindeer that is.
But it makes you wonder about what would justify such a thing.
It doesn’t seem to me like those other 364 nights are super productive.
So, I was saying.
That it doesn’t seem like those 9 have any reason for gripes.
I’m sure that National Geographic is paying them for all that reindeer documentary footage.
And Burl Ives is probably giving them kickbacks.
But it makes you wonder, or at least it makes me wonder, if they get anything out of the whole arrangement.
It’s got to be longer than a 8 hour workday.
And I’ve seen the specials. The fat man has a whip.
Maybe a union isn’t so bad.
Ever wonder what Jesus used to get for Hannukah?
If I was Jesus, not saying I could fill those shoes,
Or sandals or whatever it was.
But if I was Jesus,
I think I might’ve had a minor dilemma with this one day holiday thing.
We should stick with eight days of presents.
In honor of Jesus’s heritage, naturally.
It just doesn’t seem fair to the kids.